Credit Cards — Argumentative Essay Pages: 4 page s, example rogerian argument essay. Show Understanding of Opposition a. Even while a primary school pupils children are sometimes…. Rogerian Argument: are the SATs Outdated? In those cases, pit bulls risked their lives. Introduction Dog is considered as one of the most intelligent creatures in the world. Our Professional Writers will be glad to write your paper from scratch.
Post navigation
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. Example rogerian argument essay printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. All rights reserved, example rogerian argument essay. This material may not be published, reproduced, example rogerian argument essay, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. The Rogerian argument or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals.
For example, if you wanted to watch a comedy and your friend wanted to watch a romance, example rogerian argument essay, example rogerian argument essay might compromise by offering to watch a rom-com, example rogerian argument essay this offers each of you a bit of what you are looking for in that particular moment. Note, however, that this style of argument is decidedly less common in academic settings, where various empirical or theoretical notions of truth are often prized above the practical advantages of the Rogerian method. While Aristotelian styles of argument are often seen as eristic concerned primarily with winningthe Example rogerian argument essay argument can be viewed as more dialectic in nature a conversation between two or more parties with the goal of arriving at some mutually-satisfying solution.
Thus, practicing the Rogerian argument will enhance your ability to understand the complex relations of opposing viewpoints and provide tools for addressing such discrepancies sympathetically. However, Rogerian argument does come with disadvantages. For example, because Rogerian argument relies on example rogerian argument essay between opposing parties, it may not work well when your opponents are unwilling or unable to compromise, or if they are arguing in bad faith e. The first aim shows the reader that you understand the complexities of the argument and that you have listened sympathetically to what it is they have to say. This is important, because the success of the Rogerian arguments relies on cooperation and collaboration. The second aim puts this understanding into practice by seeking a symbiotic solution.
The third aim builds ethos and rapport between the parties. If audiences believe they share a value system with a speaker or writer, they are more likely to agree to the terms of whatever solution is presented. While each of these aims is important, Young, Becker, and Pike stress that they are just that: aims, not steps. You should not necessarily view these aims as occurring in a linear, step-by-step process. The authors present a synthesized discussion of what a successful Rogerian argument should contain, but they eschew any formalized structure, example rogerian argument essay.
The structure of the argument should instead be determined by the speaker, and it should be modified and adapted according to the rhetorical situation at hand, example rogerian argument essay. Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument. In this example, we will take the position that technology e. In so doing, we should be able to arrive at a solution that considers both arguments and develops a solution that benefits both parties while still achieving our goal of allowing technology in the classroom.
Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention. We would lay out the differing perspectives, briefly mention the merits of each argument, example rogerian argument essay, and discuss the implications closely considering all perspectives to arrive at a solution that works for everyone. Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom, example rogerian argument essay. We would also list and discuss their objections to the proposition of technology in the classroom. Here we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument. We want to show that we are fully considering their claims and not just giving lip service, in the hope that that they will give similar value to our opinions.
We could include statistics, testimony from instructors and students, or even examples from media that support their theory that digital technology can indeed be a distraction during instruction. Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom. We would still want to speak as objectively as possible in order to establish our ethos as concerned but unbiased speaker. We might even qualify our position by acknowledging that there are, of course, situations in which technology should be put away, but reiterate that, generally speaking, the presence of digital technology is a positive. For example, we could gather testimony from students who claim that using these technologies in class has been beneficial.
We could include research and scholarship that supports our position and even quote instructors who have developed pedagogy around these technologies. We might even subtly demonstrate that our opposition has failed to account for all possibilities by choosing our examples carefully. For instance, we could easily include accounts of students with learning disabilities who might otherwise have a difficult time succeeding in class without the help of assistive technologies. We would acknowledge that some example rogerian argument essay do not want digital technologies present in the classroom, as they believe they distract from paying attention during lectures. We would maintain, however, that these technologies can indeed be productive tools for learning—in some cases, they can even be a virtual requirement for learning.
We could then offer a solution: that these digital technologies should be kept example rogerian argument essay during lecture portions of a lesson except in the case of students with documented disabilities. This way, students will likely be paying attention, taking notes by hand which they can transcribe later if they so wish. However, once a class moves from lecture to activity whether group or individualstudents should be allowed to access these technologies to more effectively engage with the activity, organize their thoughts, and access information, example rogerian argument essay. Now that the instructor is no longer lecturing, it should be easier to monitor student progress and engagement and the use of technology for these activities will lead to more developed and better organized results from the students, example rogerian argument essay.
Find Info For Find Info For Academics Admissions Current Students Athletics About Careers Prospective Students Research and Partnerships Quick Links Apply News President Shop Visit Give Emergency. Purdue Online Writing Lab College of Liberal Arts. Writing Lab Purdue OWL Research Contact Site Map. General Writing Academic Writing Historical Perspectives on Argumentation. Welcome to the Purdue OWL This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. Rogerian Argument The Rogerian argument or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals, example rogerian argument essay. Contents Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument.
Introduction Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention. Opposing position Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom. Context for opposing position Here we example rogerian argument essay provide specific details that lend merit to their argument. Your Position Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom.
tkam essay
The Rogerian argument or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals. For example, if you wanted to watch a comedy and your friend wanted to watch a romance, you might compromise by offering to watch a rom-com, as this offers each of you a bit of what you are looking for in that particular moment. Note, however, that this style of argument is decidedly less common in academic settings, where various empirical or theoretical notions of truth are often prized above the practical advantages of the Rogerian method. While Aristotelian styles of argument are often seen as eristic concerned primarily with winning , the Rogerian argument can be viewed as more dialectic in nature a conversation between two or more parties with the goal of arriving at some mutually-satisfying solution.
Thus, practicing the Rogerian argument will enhance your ability to understand the complex relations of opposing viewpoints and provide tools for addressing such discrepancies sympathetically. However, Rogerian argument does come with disadvantages. For example, because Rogerian argument relies on compromise between opposing parties, it may not work well when your opponents are unwilling or unable to compromise, or if they are arguing in bad faith e. The first aim shows the reader that you understand the complexities of the argument and that you have listened sympathetically to what it is they have to say. This is important, because the success of the Rogerian arguments relies on cooperation and collaboration. The second aim puts this understanding into practice by seeking a symbiotic solution.
The third aim builds ethos and rapport between the parties. If audiences believe they share a value system with a speaker or writer, they are more likely to agree to the terms of whatever solution is presented. While each of these aims is important, Young, Becker, and Pike stress that they are just that: aims, not steps. You should not necessarily view these aims as occurring in a linear, step-by-step process. The authors present a synthesized discussion of what a successful Rogerian argument should contain, but they eschew any formalized structure. The structure of the argument should instead be determined by the speaker, and it should be modified and adapted according to the rhetorical situation at hand.
Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument. In this example, we will take the position that technology e. In so doing, we should be able to arrive at a solution that considers both arguments and develops a solution that benefits both parties while still achieving our goal of allowing technology in the classroom. Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention. We would lay out the differing perspectives, briefly mention the merits of each argument, and discuss the implications closely considering all perspectives to arrive at a solution that works for everyone.
Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom. We would also list and discuss their objections to the proposition of technology in the classroom. Here we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument. We want to show that we are fully considering their claims and not just giving lip service, in the hope that that they will give similar value to our opinions. We could include statistics, testimony from instructors and students, or even examples from media that support their theory that digital technology can indeed be a distraction during instruction.
Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom. This certificate has several advantages, and among them there are proving other people that this dog is not an aggressive one and changing their attitude towards this breed. The last aspect under consideration is about dog sports. Pit bulls can act aggressively, and there are some reasons of it such as genes and bad environment in which they were grown up Janies, Voronkin, Das, Hardman, Trseder and Studer 7.
That is why some pit bulls are considered as angry ones. It seems justified to assume that the problem exists because it is impossible to say from the first glance at the dog whether its behavior is aggressive or not. Moreover, the consequences of such guessing can be crucial ones. The ancestors of pit bulls were fighting dogs. However, pit bulls do not often start fights but they can engage in them when they see other dogs fighting. In addition to this, an owner who is not a confident one and does not know how to behave in critical situations might not prevent negative results when a dog expresses aggression.
There is also the fact that pit bulls do not like cats and other fleeing creatures. In this case, they are likely to demonstrate their chase and seize basic instincts. I strongly believe that despite the breed, any dog is susceptible for that environment in which it lives. There is a great number of cases when pit bulls have demonstrated their devotion and rescued people in complicated situations Welton. These situations happened when pit bulls prevented children from aggression of other dogs. In those cases, pit bulls risked their lives. It seems justified to assume that such phenomenon as genetics is of paramount importance; that is why there cannot be a complete trust to pit bulls Terry and Withler However, behavior of any breed depends on an owner.
Moreover, the public perception of these dogs cannot be accepted fully because every dog is a unique one. Such cases when pi tbulls helped people might become a basis to believe that right training and love to the dog can be beneficial ones in the future. Conclusion To sum up, the reputation of pit bulls cannot be considered as the best one in the society. It should be highlighted that such points of view as pit bulls are all aggressive owing to their genes and pit bulls can be non-aggressive if they are properly trained were investigated in the paper.
In most states felons who have served their time and have been released cannot vote. It's an injustice that mocks the democratic process. Nearly six million U. citizens; more than…. Dear Roommate, I am writing to you because of the recent concern about keeping the house clean. I believe we share the same goal of making sure the house is…. Between and , there was an unacceptable influx of undocumented migrants that went up from 3. Topic: Students working while studyingGeneral purpose: To argue Specific purpose: To argue that students should not study while working Thesis statement: Students should not study while working because 1 they…. Comment on this situation in terms of the different perspectives of the manufacturer and the retailers about this environmental development.
There are two different perspectives present in the given…. Credit cards have been helping and hindering our country for years now. At first, credit cards were used as a way that consumers could buy or pay for something with…. Have you ever heard the legend of Bigfoot? This hairy giant man wandering in the woods and abducting careless tourists has troubled the minds…. Not only does torture spoil the image of the United States as…. Consumerism is a modern socioeconomic phenomenon which lies in the tendency of production and buying ever-greater amounts of different goods and services. Its positive and negative impact on society is…. Your professor may flag you for plagiarism if you hand in this sample as your own. Shall we write a brand new paper for you instead?
Use code: SAMPLES Generic selectors.
No comments:
Post a Comment